Menu

Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action Recommendations Case Studies

CASE ANALYSIS

Home >> Harvard >> Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action >> Recommendations

Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action Case Study Solution

Porter's diamond structure has highlighted the fact that Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action can certainly leverage on Taiwan's production know-how and also range production. At the same time the firm has the advantage of remaining in an area where the federal government is advertising the DRAM market with individual treatment and also development of infrastructure while possibility occasions have reduced potential customers of straight competitors from international players. Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action can definitely choose a lasting competitive advantage in the Taiwanese DRAM sector by embracing methods which can lower the risk of exterior factors as well as make use of the factors of competitive edge.

It has been discussed throughout the inner as well as external analysis exactly how these critical alliances have been based on sharing of modern technology as well as capability. Nevertheless, the tactical alliances between the DRAM makers in Taiwan and international modern technology carriers in Japan as well as US have actually led to both and also positive ramifications for the DRAM sector in Taiwan.

As far as the favorable ramifications of the critical partnerships are worried, the Taiwanese DRAM manufacturers got instant access to DRAM innovation without needing to purchase R&D on their own. It can be seen how the Taiwanese market share in the DRAM sector is still extremely small and also if the regional gamers needed to invest in innovation development on their own, it might have taken them long to obtain close to Japanese and US players. The second favorable ramification has actually been the truth that it has increased performance degrees in the DRAM sector particularly as range in manufacturing has permitted even more systems to be created at each plant.

There have been several adverse implications of these alliances too. To start with the reliance on United States and Japanese gamers has enhanced so regional players are reluctant to select investment in design as well as development. The sector has actually had to face excess supply of DRAM devices which has reduced the per unit price of each unit. Not just has it resulted in lower margins for the manufacturers, it has brought the industry to a placement where DRAM producers have actually needed to rely on local governments to get their monetary circumstances sorted out.

As for the specific responses of neighborhood DRAM firms are concerned, these calculated partnerships have actually directly influenced the way each company is reacting to the emergence of Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action. Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action has been the government's effort in terms of making the DRAM industry self-reliant, industry gamers are resisting the step to combine because of these tactical alliances.

For example Nanya makes use of Micron's innovation according to this alliance while ProMOS has actually enabled Hynix to utilize 50% of its production capacity. In a similar way, Elipda and also Powerchip are sharing a strategic partnership. However, Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action might not be able to benefit from Elpida's innovation because the company is now a direct rival to Powerchip and the last is reluctant to share the modern technology with Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action. Likewise Nanya's strategic partnership with Micron is coming in the way of the last company's rate of interest in sharing technology with Competing For Development B1 The Intermediate Technology Development Group Practical Action.