Menu

Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

CASE ANALYSIS

Home >> Harvard >> Cox Communications Inc 1999 >> Porters Analysis

Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Solution

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The provider in the Taiwanese Cox Communications Inc 1999 market has a reduced negotiating power despite the fact that the industry has prominence of three players including Powerchip, Nanya and ProMOS. Cox Communications Inc 1999 suppliers are plain initial tools manufacturers in strategic alliances with international players for modern technology. The 2nd reason for a low negotiating power is the reality that there is excess supply of Cox Communications Inc 1999 systems due to the big scale manufacturing of these dominant market gamers which has lowered the price per unit as well as increased the bargaining power of the buyer.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The danger of alternatives on the market is high given the truth that Taiwanese producers compete with market show worldwide gamers like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung and Fujitsu. This shows that the marketplace has a high degree of rivalry where suppliers that have design and also development capabilities in addition to making know-how may be able to have a greater negotiating power over the marketplace.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The market is dominated by players like Micron, Elpida, Samsung as well as Hynix which even more minimize the purchasing power of Taiwanese OEMs. The reality that these calculated players do not enable the Taiwanese OEMs to have access to technology indicates that they have a greater bargaining power relatively.

Threat of Entry:

Threats of entrance in the Cox Communications Inc 1999 manufacturing market are low because of the fact that structure wafer fabs and also buying devices is highly expensive.For just 30,000 units a month the funding demands can range from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion relying on the dimension of the systems. Along with this, the production needed to be in the latest modern technology and there for new players would certainly not have the ability to compete with leading Cox Communications Inc 1999 OEMs (initial devices producers) in Taiwan which were able to take pleasure in economic situations of scale. The current market had a demand-supply discrepancy and so oversupply was already making it hard to permit new gamers to appreciate high margins.

Firm Strategy:

The region's manufacturing firms have actually counted on a strategy of mass production in order to decrease expenses through economic situations of range. Because Cox Communications Inc 1999 production makes use of typical processes and standard and also specialty Cox Communications Inc 1999 are the only 2 groups of Cox Communications Inc 1999 being manufactured, the procedures can conveniently make use of automation. The market has leading manufacturers that have actually formed alliances in exchange for technology from Oriental and also Japanese firms. While this has actually led to accessibility of technology and scale, there has actually been disequilibrium in the Cox Communications Inc 1999 sector.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Atmosphere

Based on the internal and also external audits, opportunities such as strategicalliances with modern technology partners or development via merging/ procurement can be checked out by TMC. In addition to this, a step towards mobile memory is likewise a possibility for TMC particularly as this is a specific niche market. Hazards can be seen in the kind of over dependence on international players for technology and competitors from the United States as well as Japanese Cox Communications Inc 1999 manufacturers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis