Harlan Foundation Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis


Home >> Harvard >> Harlan Foundation >> Porters Analysis

Harlan Foundation Case Study Solution

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The distributor in the Taiwanese Harlan Foundation sector has a low bargaining power although that the sector has dominance of three gamers including Powerchip, Nanya and ProMOS. Harlan Foundation makers are mere initial tools makers in tactical alliances with international gamers in exchange for technology. The second reason for a low bargaining power is the truth that there is excess supply of Harlan Foundation systems as a result of the huge scale production of these leading industry gamers which has actually decreased the rate per unit as well as enhanced the bargaining power of the customer.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The danger of replacements in the market is high offered the fact that Taiwanese suppliers take on market show worldwide gamers like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung and Fujitsu. This indicates that the market has a high level of rivalry where manufacturers that have design as well as advancement capabilities in addition to manufacturing know-how may be able to have a greater bargaining power over the market.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The marketplace is dominated by players like Micron, Elpida, Samsung as well as Hynix which better decrease the buying powers of Taiwanese OEMs. The reality that these calculated players do not permit the Taiwanese OEMs to have access to innovation indicates that they have a greater negotiating power relatively.

Threat of Entry:

Dangers of access in the Harlan Foundation production industry are low because of the reality that building wafer fabs as well as acquiring devices is highly expensive.For simply 30,000 devices a month the capital requirements can range from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion depending upon the size of the devices. Along with this, the production needed to be in the most recent technology as well as there for new players would not be able to take on dominant Harlan Foundation OEMs (original equipment suppliers) in Taiwan which were able to enjoy economic situations of scale. The current market had a demand-supply imbalance and so oversupply was currently making it challenging to permit brand-new players to take pleasure in high margins.

Firm Strategy:

The area's manufacturing companies have actually counted on a strategy of automation in order to lower expenses through economies of range. Given that Harlan Foundation manufacturing uses standard procedures and also common and specialized Harlan Foundation are the only 2 classifications of Harlan Foundation being manufactured, the procedures can quickly use automation. The market has dominant producers that have actually created alliances for technology from Oriental and Japanese firms. While this has actually led to accessibility of modern technology and also scale, there has actually been disequilibrium in the Harlan Foundation industry.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Setting

Based on the interior and also external audits, chances such as strategicalliances with modern technology partners or growth through merger/ acquisition can be explored by TMC. A move towards mobile memory is also an opportunity for TMC specifically as this is a specific niche market. Hazards can be seen in the form of over dependence on foreign gamers for innovation as well as competitors from the US and also Japanese Harlan Foundation manufacturers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis