Menu

Investment Technology Group Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

CASE STUDY

Home >> Harvard >> Investment Technology Group >> Porters Analysis

Investment Technology Group Case Study Solution

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The supplier in the Taiwanese Investment Technology Group market has a reduced negotiating power despite the fact that the market has dominance of three gamers including Powerchip, Nanya and also ProMOS. Investment Technology Group producers are simple original equipment suppliers in strategic alliances with international gamers for technology. The second reason for a low negotiating power is the fact that there is excess supply of Investment Technology Group units due to the big scale production of these dominant sector gamers which has actually reduced the cost per unit as well as enhanced the negotiating power of the customer.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The threat of substitutes out there is high given the fact that Taiwanese producers take on market share with worldwide gamers like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung and also Fujitsu. This indicates that the market has a high degree of rivalry where producers that have style and advancement abilities in addition to making competence may have the ability to have a higher negotiating power over the market.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The marketplace is controlled by players like Micron, Elpida, Samsung and Hynix which even more decrease the buying powers of Taiwanese OEMs. The reality that these tactical players do not allow the Taiwanese OEMs to have accessibility to innovation indicates that they have a higher bargaining power fairly.

Threat of Entry:

Dangers of access in the Investment Technology Group manufacturing market are low owing to the fact that structure wafer fabs and also purchasing tools is highly expensive.For simply 30,000 units a month the capital demands can vary from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion depending on the dimension of the devices. The manufacturing needed to be in the most current innovation and there for new players would not be able to contend with leading Investment Technology Group OEMs (initial equipment producers) in Taiwan which were able to appreciate economies of scale. In addition to this the current market had a demand-supply inequality therefore oversupply was already making it challenging to permit brand-new gamers to appreciate high margins.

Firm Strategy:

The area's production companies have relied on a method of mass production in order to decrease costs via economic situations of range. Since Investment Technology Group production utilizes common processes as well as common as well as specialized Investment Technology Group are the only two groups of Investment Technology Group being produced, the processes can conveniently utilize mass production. The industry has dominant producers that have actually created alliances in exchange for innovation from Korean and Japanese firms. While this has caused schedule of technology and also scale, there has actually been disequilibrium in the Investment Technology Group industry.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Setting

According to the interior and outside audits, possibilities such as strategicalliances with modern technology companions or development through merger/ purchase can be explored by TMC. A step towards mobile memory is additionally an opportunity for TMC specifically as this is a particular niche market. Risks can be seen in the kind of over reliance on international players for technology and competitors from the US and also Japanese Investment Technology Group makers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis