Menu

2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

CASE SOLUTION

Home >> Harvard >> 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways >> Porters Analysis

2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways Case Study Help

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The distributor in the Taiwanese 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways sector has a low bargaining power although that the sector has supremacy of 3 gamers consisting of Powerchip, Nanya as well as ProMOS. 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways producers are mere original equipment producers in calculated alliances with foreign gamers for innovation. The second factor for a reduced bargaining power is the fact that there is excess supply of 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways systems because of the huge scale production of these leading industry gamers which has actually lowered the rate each and enhanced the bargaining power of the customer.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The threat of replacements in the marketplace is high offered the fact that Taiwanese makers take on market show to worldwide players like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung as well as Fujitsu. This shows that the market has a high level of competition where suppliers that have style and development capacities along with producing proficiency may have the ability to have a higher negotiating power over the marketplace.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The market is controlled by players like Micron, Elpida, Samsung as well as Hynix which even more lower the buying powers of Taiwanese OEMs. The reality that these critical gamers do not allow the Taiwanese OEMs to have access to innovation shows that they have a greater bargaining power comparatively.

Threat of Entry:

Hazards of entrance in the 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways production sector are reduced because of the reality that structure wafer fabs as well as buying devices is highly expensive.For just 30,000 systems a month the funding requirements can range from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion depending on the size of the systems. In addition to this, the manufacturing needed to be in the current technology and also there for brand-new gamers would not have the ability to take on dominant 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways OEMs (original devices producers) in Taiwan which had the ability to enjoy economies of scale. The current market had a demand-supply discrepancy and also so oversupply was already making it hard to permit brand-new players to enjoy high margins.

Firm Strategy:

Given that 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways production uses common procedures and also typical and also specialized 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways are the only two classifications of 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways being made, the procedures can easily make usage of mass manufacturing. While this has actually led to schedule of technology as well as range, there has actually been disequilibrium in the 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways sector.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Environment

Based on the interior and also external audits, opportunities such as strategicalliances with technology companions or development via merger/ acquisition can be checked out by TMC. A move in the direction of mobile memory is also an opportunity for TMC especially as this is a particular niche market. Hazards can be seen in the form of over dependence on international players for modern technology and competition from the United States and also Japanese 2012 Fuel Hedging At Jetblue Airways makers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis