Menu

Triple Point Technology Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

CASE ANALYSIS

Home >> Harvard >> Triple Point Technology >> Porters Analysis

Triple Point Technology Case Study Solution

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The provider in the Taiwanese Triple Point Technology industry has a reduced bargaining power despite the fact that the industry has supremacy of 3 gamers including Powerchip, Nanya and ProMOS. Triple Point Technology makers are mere initial devices suppliers in critical partnerships with international players in exchange for innovation. The second factor for a low bargaining power is the fact that there is excess supply of Triple Point Technology devices as a result of the large range manufacturing of these dominant market gamers which has lowered the rate each and boosted the bargaining power of the purchaser.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The threat of alternatives in the market is high provided the reality that Taiwanese manufacturers compete with market show to international players like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung as well as Fujitsu. This suggests that the marketplace has a high degree of rivalry where producers that have layout and advancement abilities in addition to manufacturing experience might be able to have a higher bargaining power over the marketplace.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The marketplace is controlled by players like Micron, Elpida, Samsung and also Hynix which further reduce the purchasing power of Taiwanese OEMs. The fact that these calculated gamers do not enable the Taiwanese OEMs to have access to technology shows that they have a greater bargaining power comparatively.

Threat of Entry:

Risks of entry in the Triple Point Technology manufacturing market are low due to the fact that building wafer fabs and also acquiring tools is highly expensive.For just 30,000 devices a month the capital requirements can range from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion relying on the dimension of the units. Along with this, the manufacturing needed to be in the current modern technology and also there for brand-new gamers would certainly not have the ability to compete with dominant Triple Point Technology OEMs (initial tools producers) in Taiwan which were able to delight in economic situations of range. Along with this the current market had a demand-supply inequality therefore oversupply was currently making it hard to enable brand-new gamers to delight in high margins.

Firm Strategy:

The region's production firms have counted on an approach of automation in order to reduce expenses with economic situations of scale. Given that Triple Point Technology manufacturing makes use of typical procedures and basic as well as specialized Triple Point Technology are the only 2 groups of Triple Point Technology being produced, the procedures can quickly take advantage of mass production. The market has leading manufacturers that have actually developed partnerships for technology from Oriental and also Japanese companies. While this has led to availability of modern technology and also scale, there has been disequilibrium in the Triple Point Technology market.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Atmosphere

According to the inner as well as external audits, opportunities such as strategicalliances with modern technology partners or development with merging/ purchase can be discovered by TMC. A move towards mobile memory is also an opportunity for TMC especially as this is a particular niche market. Dangers can be seen in the form of over dependence on foreign gamers for innovation as well as competition from the United States and Japanese Triple Point Technology producers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis