Menu

Cambridge Nanotech Case Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

CASE SOLUTION

Home >> Kelloggs >> Cambridge Nanotech >> Porters Analysis

Cambridge Nanotech Case Study Analysis

Bargaining Power of Supplier:

The distributor in the Taiwanese Cambridge Nanotech sector has a reduced bargaining power although that the market has supremacy of three gamers consisting of Powerchip, Nanya and ProMOS. Cambridge Nanotech manufacturers are simple original equipment producers in strategic partnerships with international gamers for innovation. The second reason for a low bargaining power is the truth that there is excess supply of Cambridge Nanotech devices because of the large range production of these dominant market gamers which has actually reduced the price per unit and also enhanced the negotiating power of the customer.

Threat of Substitutes & Degree of Rivalry:

The hazard of alternatives in the marketplace is high given the reality that Taiwanese producers take on market show global gamers like Intel, Motorola, IBM, Hitachi, NEC, Toshiba, Samsung and also Fujitsu. This indicates that the market has a high degree of competition where manufacturers that have design and also development capacities along with making experience might have the ability to have a higher negotiating power over the market.

Bargaining Power of Buyer:

The market is dominated by gamers like Micron, Elpida, Samsung and Hynix which further minimize the buying powers of Taiwanese OEMs. The reality that these critical players do not permit the Taiwanese OEMs to have access to technology suggests that they have a higher negotiating power somewhat.

Threat of Entry:

Threats of entrance in the Cambridge Nanotech manufacturing sector are reduced due to the reality that building wafer fabs as well as purchasing devices is highly expensive.For just 30,000 devices a month the resources needs can range from $ 500 million to $2.5 billion relying on the size of the systems. The manufacturing needed to be in the newest innovation as well as there for new players would certainly not be able to complete with dominant Cambridge Nanotech OEMs (initial tools producers) in Taiwan which were able to enjoy economies of range. The present market had a demand-supply inequality as well as so surplus was already making it difficult to allow brand-new gamers to enjoy high margins.

Firm Strategy:

Because Cambridge Nanotech manufacturing uses standard processes as well as basic and specialty Cambridge Nanotech are the only two groups of Cambridge Nanotech being made, the procedures can conveniently make usage of mass manufacturing. While this has actually led to accessibility of modern technology as well as range, there has been disequilibrium in the Cambridge Nanotech market.

Threats & Opportunities in the External Environment

Based on the internal and outside audits, opportunities such as strategicalliances with modern technology companions or development through merger/ procurement can be discovered by TMC. In addition to this, a step in the direction of mobile memory is likewise a possibility for TMC particularly as this is a niche market. Hazards can be seen in the type of over dependancy on international gamers for innovation as well as competitors from the US as well as Japanese Cambridge Nanotech makers.

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis